![]() nebulosity, also has a few features that meade dosn't have such as DPP and OSC line-filter conversion, so there may still be a use for neb, but over-all I don't like using it. With under-sampled shots, drizzle is the bees knees. I do use it sometimes however, since it is one of the few software packages out there, other than Meades stuff, that allows you to use drizzle. If I could program it to do it automatically, I'd use it. My calibration routine is pretty standard, so I hate repeating the same steps every time. And if your like me and use lots of sub-exposures, this is extremely tedious. Nebulosity would be great if it had automatic calibration, stacking and alignment, but you have to do everything manually, which means sitting and watching it. I don't think it will work with my DSLR files, but it actually has a ton of capability. I'd say meade software is better, if you can use it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |